Boston Globe gets it wrong again - Casinos in Massachusetts
Todays Sunday Globe front page above the fold screaming headline:
53% in poll back Patrick casinos plan
Very first sentence in the story by Andea Estes:
A majority of Massachusetts residents supports Governor Deval Patrick’s proposal to license resort-style casinos across the state, …
Slight problem with that. They don’t.
To the Globes credit, they include the entire poll details in a PDF. I initially went there to find the margin of error for the poll. The 4.4% margin of error was not metioned in the story but was footnoted in an accompanying graphic. So it’s within the margin of error that the “majority of residents support Patrick’s plan”? That doesn’t sound like it deserves a screaming page 1 headline to me. But that’s not the real problem with this.
I went to the actual poll and looked for the question: Do you support Gov. Patrick’s Casino plan?
That question WAS NEVER ASKED!!!!!!!!!!
You have to go to page 28 of the PDF doc to find the question they used to come to their headline conclusion. Here it is:
“I’d like to turn to the subject of gambling in Massachusetts. Governor Patrick has recently proposed legal casino gambling, including slot machines, at three locations in Massachusetts. Supporters argue that this will bring in hundreds of millions of dollars in revenues to the State of Massachusetts while opponents argue that casinos will increase social problems from compulsive gambling. What about you … do you favor or oppose legalizing casino gambling in Massachusetts?” “Is that strongly or just somewhat?”
After a lengthy preamble that starts with Patricks plan for 3 casinos across the state and ends who knows where since all we get is the dot dot dot treatment we finally get to the question they asked:
Do you favor or oppose legalizing casino gambling in Massachusetts?
That was the friggin question. Not “Do you agree with Patrick’s plan?”
Christ almighty. Is this so fucking hard to understand? If it is, the very next question in the poll tries to clear it up:
“As I mentioned, Governor Patrick has proposed 3 casinos in Massachusetts. How many casinos, if any, would you like to see in Massachusetts?”
Based on the Front Page screaming headline and accompanying story any rational person would have to assume that 53% of the respondants would answer “3 or more casinos.”
Nope.
29% say None, 23% say One and 9% say Two. Only 28% say Three and 5% say Four or more.
Translated to non-globespeak we have 52% of the people who want no more that 1 casino in Massachusets. The Goverenor’s plan calls for 3 casinos and the poll shows that only 33% agree with 3 casinos.
That is way outside the margin of error and a landslide win for people who disagree with the Governors plan.
Is this bias in favor of Governor Moonbat, Bias in favor of anything that might generate more tax revenue, just plain stupidity on the part of the Globe or all 3.
Who the fuck knows.
The issue of casinos is a hot one in Massachusetts. The proposed Indian Tribe Casino in Middleborough seemed to come out of nowhere and has generated heated debate in that town. I checked Dan Kennedy’s blog and sure enough, he has a post up on the Globe story. Dan grew up in Middleborough and is adamantly against the Casino and the proces the town government has used to authorize the plan. I have to sympathise with Dan and the Opponents, it does sound like they are getting a raw deal. If that casino gets built Middleborough will change forever.
But back to the Globe story. Amazingly even Dan Kennedy misses the glaring misrepresentation of the poll results.
Dan focuses on the questions that highlight NIMBY opposition to casinos in Massachusetts. Most people don’t want a Casino near their house. Which by itself is also a repudiation of Patricks plan since it’s primary focus is to put a Casino within reach of everyone in Massachusetts.
But that doesn’t fit the Globe’s ”narrative”.
